A mathematical problem-solving framework-based Integrated STEM: Theory and practice

Ijtihadi Kamilia Amalina, Tibor Vidákovich

Abstract


STEM problem-solving is a core standard in education to tackle the 21st-century challenge. However, the under-represented mathematics in STEM assessment has become an issue. Moreover, the existing frameworks of STEM problem-solving are suitable for assessing activity during teaching and learning. This study covers the limitations by developing a new mathematical problem-solving-based integrated STEM framework and applying it into practice. The new framework combines and integrates frameworks in every STEM discipline. It applies in developing scenario based-test with prompting questions to show the practical use of the framework. The test was administered to 31 of 7th graders students (M=12.29, SD=.46) to prove the consistency of the new framework and the effective role of scenario and prompting questions. The results revealed four types of flows in the problem-solving process posed by students with different in evaluating, representing, and designing phases. The flow of problem-solving and the indicators in a new model were consistent but shown as a dependent process. The scenario and prompting questions worked effectively regardless of a multidimensional prompting question. Several recommendations for developing a test based on the new framework are discussed. Quantitative analysis with large sample size is required for future study.

Keywords


Framework; Mathematics; Problem-Solving; STEM;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Annaggar, A., & Rudiger, T. (2020). A video game as an assessment tool of problem-solving competence. April.

Aurah, C. M., Cassady, J. C., & McConnell, T. J. (2014). Predicting Problem Solving Ability From Metacognition and Self-Efficacy Beliefs on a Cross Validated Sample. British Journal of Education, 2(1), 49–72.

Baele, L. C. (2017). Middle School Engineering Problem Solving using Traditional vs . E-PBL Module Instruction (Issue January). Aurora University.

Bakar, M. A. A., & Ismail, N. (2020). Express students’ problem solving skills from metacognitive skills perspective on effective mathematics learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1404–1412. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080433

Bayazit, I. (2013). An investigation of problem solving approaches, strategies, and models used by the 7th and 8th grade students when solving real-world problems. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 13(3), 1920–1927. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2013.3.1419

Boero, P. (1999). Paolo Boero 1999. International Newsletter on the Teaching and Learning of Mtahematical Proof. http://www.lettredelapreuve.org/OldPreuve/Newsletter/990708Theme/990708ThemeUK.html

Docktor, J. L., Dornfeld, J., Frodermann, E., Heller, K., Hsu, L., Jackson, K. A., Mason, A., Ryan, Q. X., & Yang, J. (2016). Assessing student written problem solutions: A problem-solving rubric with application to introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010130

Erdem-Keklik, D. (2013). The Scale for Problem Solving Skills in Mathematics: Further Evidence for Construct Validity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.527

Evans, T., Thomas, M. O. J., & Klymchuk, S. (2020). Non-routine problem solving through the lens of self-efficacy. Higher Education Research and Development, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1818061

Fan, L., & Zhu, Y. (2000). Problem solving in Singaporean secondary mathematics textbooks. The Mathematics Educator, 5(1–2), 117–141.

Gray, G. L., Costanzo, F., & Plesha, M. E. (2005). Problem solving in statics and dynamics: A proposal for a structured approach. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 11543–11554. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--15371

Jolly, A. (2016). STEM by design: Strategies and activities for grades 4-8. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315679976

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z

Lasa, A., Abaurrea, J., & Iribas, H. (2020). MATHEMATICAL CONTENT on STEM ACTIVITIES. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.11.3.11327.333-346

Maass, K., Geiger, V., Ariza, M. R., & Goos, M. (2019). The Role of Mathematics in interdisciplinary STEM education. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 51(6), 869–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01100-5

Mehalik, M. M., Doppelt, Y., & Schuun, C. D. (2008). Middle-School Science Through Design- Based Learning versus Scripted Inquiry : Better Overall Science Concept Learning. Journal of En, January, 71–85.

Merrill, K. L., Smith, S. W., Cumming, M. M., & Daunic, A. P. (2017). A Review of Social Problem-Solving Interventions: Past Findings, Current Status, and Future Directions. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 71–102. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316652943

Naqiyah, M., Rosana, D., Sukardiyono, & Ernasari. (2020). Nationalism of High School Student. 13(4), 921–936.

OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.178/9789264190511-en

OECD. (2018). PISA 2022 MATHEMATICS FRAMEWORK ( DRAFT ) (Issue November 2018). https://pisa2022-maths.oecd.org/

Osborne, J. (2013). The 21st century challenge for science education: Assessing scientific reasoning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.07.006

Ozturk, T., & Guven, B. (2016). Evaluating students’ beliefs in problem solving process: A case study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(3), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1208a

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003

Polya, G. (1978). How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method second edition. In The Mathematical Gazette (Vol. 30, p. 181). http://www.jstor.org/stable/3609122?origin=crossref

Priemer, B., Eilerts, K., Filler, A., Pinkwart, N., Rösken-Winter, B., Tiemann, R., & Zu Belzen, A. U. (2020). A framework to foster problem-solving in STEM and computing education. Research in Science and Technological Education, 38(1), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1600490

Robinson, N. (2016). A case study exploring the effects of using an integrative STEM curriculum on eighth grade students ’ performance and engagement in the mathematics classroom. Georgia State University.

Rudibyani, R. B., Perdana, R., & Elisanti, E. (2020). Development of problem-solving-based knowledge assessment instrument in electrochemistry. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 957–974. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13458a

Scherer, R., Meßinger-Koppelt, J., & Tiemann, R. (2014). Developing a computer-based assessment of complex problem solving in Chemistry. International Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-7822-1-2

Schraw, G., & Sperling, R. (1994). Schraw (1994) Assessing metacognitive awareness. In Contemporary Educational Psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 460–475).

Shahali, M. E. H., Halim, L., Rasul, M. S., Osman, K., & Zulkifeli, M. A. (2017). STEM learning through engineering design: Impact on middle secondary students’ interest towards STEM. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 1189–1211. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00667a

Shanta, S., & Wells, J. G. (2020). T/E design based learning: assessing student critical thinking and problem solving abilities. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09608-8

Shute, V. J., Wang, L., Greiff, S., Zhao, W., & Moore, G. (2016). Measuring problem solving skills via stealth assessment in an engaging video game. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.047

Stylianou, D. A. (2011). An examination of middle school students’ representation practices in mathematical problem solving through the lens of expert work: Towards an organizing scheme. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(3), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9273-2

Tambychik, T., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2010). Students’ difficulties in mathematics problem-solving: What do they say? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8(August), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.020

Toraman, Ç., Orakcı, Ş., & Aktan, O. (2020). Analysis of the Relationships between Mathematics Achievement, Reflective Thinking of Problem Solving and Metacognitive Awareness. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(2), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.241.6

Vargas, C. (2018). 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education Hamburg , 24-31 July 2016 CRITICAL THINKING AND PROBLEM SOLVING. July 2016.

Velasquez, Q. F., & Bueno, D. C. (2019). Metacognitive Skills in Problem Solving of Senior High School STEM Strand Students Metacognitive Skills in Problem-Solving among Senior High School STEM Strand Students. Institutional Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 2(June), 124–129. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18820.99207

Verschaffel, L., Schukajlow, S., Star, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Word problems in mathematics education: a survey. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01130-4

Wells, J. G. (2016). PIRPOSAL model of integrative STEM education: Conceptual and pedagogical framework for classroom implementation. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 75(6), 12–19. http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2013/9/16/many-us-bridges-arestructurallyunsoundsaysnewreport.html

Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941–967. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20259

Woods, D. R. (2000). An Evidence-Based Strategy. Journal of Engineering Education, October, 443–459.

Woods, Donald R. (2000). An Evidence-Based Strategy. Journal of Engineering Education, October, 443–459.

Wu, M., & Adams, R. J. (2006). Modelling mathematics problem solving item responses using a multidimensional IRT model. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(2), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217438

Yata, C., Ohtani, T., & Isobe, M. (2020). Conceptual framework of STEM based on Japanese subject principles. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00205-8




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v5i1.105

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Ijtihadi Kamilia Amalina, Tibor Vidákovich

International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research (IJTMER)

E-ISSN 2621-8488

Published by the SAINTIS Publishing
Homepage: http://ijtmer.saintispub.com/index.php/ijtmer/index
Editor E-mail : ijtmer@saintispub.com; ijtmer@gmail.com

Creative Commons License  IJTMER is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.