Gold Open Access

Innovation of the problem based learning model with contextual teaching learning in mathematics learning in the Industrial Revolution 4.0 era: A comparative case studies

Nining Hajeniati(1), Andi Kaharuddin(2Mail),
(1) Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Lakidende, Southeast Sulawesi, 93461, Indonesia
(2) Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Lakidende, Southeast Sulawesi, 93461, Indonesia

Mail Corresponding Author


This study aims to compare learning outcomes, activeness, and students’ responses in learning mathematics in the era of the industrial revolution 4.0. Type of study is a quasi-experimental design with a pretest post-test only comparison design. The study population was the high school students in class XI with the samples consisting of three classes from different schools. The results of the descriptive and inferential analysis show that there were differences from the application of the three learning models which were then being tested by Tukey and they were depicted descriptively and inferentially that the combination model of Problem based learning setting Contextual teaching learning was more effective than the model of Problem based learning and Contextual teaching learning in terms of learning outcomes, activeness and student responses in the industrial revolution 4.0.


Problem based learning; Contextual teaching learning; Mathematics Learning; Industrial Revolution Era 4.0


Article DOI


Article Metrics

 Abstract views : 353 
 PDF views : 188 


Article Pages

Pages: 222-227


Full Text:



Akib, I. (2016). The description of relationship between mathematics charasteristic and Bugis culture values. Global Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 12(4), 2765–2776.

Ariani, D. N. (2017). Strategi Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SD/MI Informasi. Muallimuna : Jurnal Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 3(1), 96–107.

Avisca, K. (2017). Penggunaan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe make a match berbantuan media speaking card sebagai upaya peningkatan hasil belajar. FKIP Uiversitas Kristen Satya Wacana, 33(1), 56–63.

Bütüner, S. Ö., Baki, A., & The, A. (2020). The Use of History of Mathematics in the Mathematics Classroom : An Action Study To cite this article : The Use of History of Mathematics in the Mathematics Classroom : An Action Study. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 8.

Cheriani, Mahmud, A., Tahmir, S., Manda, D., & Dirawan, G. D. (2015). Problem-based learning-buginese cultural knowledge model-case study: Teaching mathematics at junior high school. International Education Studies, 8(4), 104–110.

Greiff, S., Holt, D. V., & Funke, J. (2013). Perspectives on problem solving in educational assessment: Analytical, interactive, and collaborative problem solving. Journal of Problem Solving, 5(2), 71–91.

Kaharuddin, A. (2013). Effectiveness Comparative of Scientific Approach Elpsa and Open-Ended Setting Cooperative Stad Types of Mathematics Learning At Vii Class Smp Negeri of a Accreditation in Makassar. Jurnal Daya Matematis, 1(1), 29.

Kaharuddin, A. (2018). Keefektifan Model Make A Match dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Siswa Kelas VI Sekolah Dasar di Kecamatan Marioriwawo. Madrasah, 11(1), 13.

Kaharuddin, A. (2019a). Effect of Problem Based Learning Model on Mathematical Learning Outcomes of 6th Grade Students of Elementary School Accredited B in Kendari City. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 1(2), 43–46.

Kaharuddin, A. (2019b). Improving Students’ Learning Outcomes through Peer Tutoring with Cooperative Settings. Journal of Mathematical Pedagogy, 1(1), 30–36.

Kaharuddin, A., & Liasambu, L. (2019). Penerapan Model STAD dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 04(02), 29–37.

Kaharuddin, A., & Magfirah, I. (2018). Perbandingan Keefektifan Model Tps Stad Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Kelas Vi Sekolah Dasar Negeri Di Kabupaten Soppeng. Taman Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Ke-SD-An, 2(2), 223.

Magfirah, I., Kaharuddin, A., & Wangse, F. (2019). Efektifitas Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (Tps) Dengan Pendekatan Open-Ended Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Materi Segi Empat Siswa Kelas Viii Smpn 14 Buru. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengembangan Profesi, 9(1), 686–694.

Mardhiyana, D., & Nasution, N. B. (2018). Kesiapan Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika Menggunakan E-Learning dalam Menghadapi Era Revolusi Industri 4 . 0. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Ahmad Dahlan 2018, (2007), 31–35.

Mubarak, Z. (2018). Blended Learning, Solusi Pembelajaran di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0*. 2, 1–6.

Mukhlis, M., & Tohir, M. (2019). Instrumen Pengukur Creativity And Innovation Mathematic Skills Mahasiswa pada. (1), 65–73.

Newton, P. M., & Miah, M. (2017). Evidence-based higher education - Is the learning styles “myth” important? Frontiers in Psychology, 8(MAR), 1–9.

Nur Fidiyanti, H. H. (2017). Effect Of Implementation Of Cooperative Learning Model Make A Match Technique On Student Learning Motivation In Social Science Learning. International Journal Pedagogy of Social Studies, 2(1), 104.

Olivares, V., Ceglie, R. J., The, R. J., Olivares, V., & Ceglie, R. J. (2020). The Intergenerational Transmission of Mathematics Attitudes To cite this article : The Intergenerational Transmission of Mathematics Attitudes. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 8.

Putri, E. P. K., Muslimah, -, Ratman, -, Mustapa, K., & Gani, A. (2018). Effect of Cooperative Make a Match Learning Model on Student’s Learning Outcomes on Electrolyte and Non-Electrolyte Solutions Topics. Atlantis Press, 174(Ice 2017), 134–137.

Rahayu, S., & Cahyadi, R. (2019). Experimentation of PBL And TPS Learning Model Using CTL Approach Towards Mathematics Learning Outcomes Viewed from Student Learning Styles. 2(4), 215–218.

Rahayu, S., & Suningsih, A. (2018). The Effects of Type Learning Model Numbered Head Together And Think Pair Share. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 1(1), 19.

Rahman, A. (2016). Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Numbered Heads Together ( Pbl ) Dan Two Stay Twostray ( Ctl ) Dengan Pendekatan. 4(3), 283–293.

Ramful, A., & Lowrie, T. (2015). Spatial Visualisation and Cognitive Style : How Do Gender Differences Play Out ? Mathematics Education in the Margins, 508–515.

Roger M Nisbet. (2018). Тайны католических монашеских орденов.

Sadikin, & Kaharuddin, A. (2019). Identifikasi Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematika Ditinjau Dari Self-Concept Matematis Dan Gender. Prosiding SNPMAT, 2(1), 190–198.

Setyawati, R., Sukartiningsih, W., & Subroto, W. (2018). Make and match method supported by picture media to improve students’ learning activity. 173(Icei 2017), 276–279.

Sulo, M. (2018). The Meaning of Sipakatau Sipakalebbi Sipakainge in Wajo ( A Semantical Analysis ). 19(2), 34–40.

Thompson, V. L., & McDowell, Y. L. (2019). A case study comparing student experiences and success in an undergraduate mathematics course offered through online, blended, and face-to-face instruction. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 7(2), 116–136.

Wang, A. Y. (2012). Exploring the relationship of creative thinking to reading and writing. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(1), 38–47.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2022 Nining Hajeniati, Andi Kaharuddin

International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research (IJTMER)

E-ISSN 2621-8488

Published by the SAINTIS Publishing
Editor E-mail :;

Creative Commons License  IJTMER is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.