Gold Open Access

Exploring Teachers' Perspectives and Influential Factors in Math instruction for Goodhope Primary Schools

Shimmy Sethukge(1), End Salani(2Mail),
(1) Ministry of Basic Education and Child Welfare, Gaborone, Botswana
(2) University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana

Mail Corresponding Author

Abstract


In this research, we delve into the perspectives of teachers and influential factors shaping math instruction in upper primary schools within the Goodhope region of Botswana. Recognizing the significance of mathematics education and the diverse learning needs of students, understanding effective teaching strategies becomes paramount. The study aims to authenticate various teaching and learning strategies employed by teachers to enhance performance in upper primary classes. The specific objectives include identifying teachers' perceptions of strategy efficacy, determining influencing factors on teaching strategies, and examining the impact of different teaching strategies on learners' performance. Guided by Critical and Constructivism theories, the research aims to uncover the nature of problems contributing to low learner performance (Critical theory) and explore engaging strategies for individual learners (Constructivism theory). The literature review underscores the study's foundation, showcasing how prior research informs the current investigation. Employing an embedded mixed methods approach, the study involved thirty teachers from ten selected schools in the Goodhope sub-region. Data collection utilized questionnaires and semi-structured interviews, while analysis employed descriptive statistics and thematic content analyses. Findings indicate that teachers employ a variety of effective teaching strategies, including incorporating games, relating mathematics to real-life situations, and using spoken and written praise. These strategies were perceived as key contributors to improving learner performance. Additionally, the study highlights the importance of satisfying learners' needs and interests for success. The recommendation emphasizes the application of diverse learner-centered teaching strategies and activities to enhance mathematics learning outcomes.

Keywords


Mathematics instruction; Teaching strategies; Learner performance; Critical theory;Constructivism theory

   

Article DOI



DOI: https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v7i3.346 		       

Article Metrics

 Abstract views : 390 
 PDF views : 447 


   

Article Pages


Pages: 163-181

   

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adunola, O. (2011). The impact of teaching methods on academic performance of primary school pupils in mathematics: A case study of Ogun State, Nigeria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 2(6), 465-470. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/85vfb

Akey, T. M. (2006). School context, student attitudes and behavior, and academic achievement: An exploratory analysis. Education and Urban Society, 38(1), 135-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124505281653Al-Haddad, M. (2010). Effective teaching strategies in mathematics: A literature review. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4(1), 1-18.

Antony, T., & Walshaw, M. (2009). Effective mathematics teaching and the development of a classroom observation instrument. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(3), 27-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217432

Atherton, J. S. (2010). Learning and teaching: Constructivism in learning. Retrieved from http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/constructivism.htm

Baikie, K. A. (2000). Investigating teachers’ conceptions of the teaching of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(3), 241-269. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003876405231

Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554

Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). Academic Press.

Basit, T. N. (2010). Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis. Educational Research, 52(3), 263-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881003731166

Bell, C. A. (1981). Teacher characteristics and student learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 32(1), 22-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718103200105

Beswick, K. (2007). Teachers' beliefs about school mathematics and mathematicians' mathematics and their relationship to practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 23-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9021-2

Bose, K., Tsamaase, M. and Seetso, G. (2013) Teaching of Science and Mathematics in Pre-Schools of Botswana: The Existing Practices. Creative Education, 4, 43-51. https://doi: 10.4236/ce.2013.47A1006.

Bouck, E. C., & Flanagan, S. M. (2010). Effects of a systematic teacher-delivered tactile graphic organizer instruction with elementary students with and without disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 25(3), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341002500303

Boulton-Lewis, G. M., Wilss, L., & Mutch, S. (2000). Relationship between students' experience of the teaching–learning environment and achievement in different stages of nursing programs. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(2), 361-373. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01276.x

Cheang, C. C., Lee, T. W., Lim, C. C., Tan, H. S., & Teh, L. A. (2009). Pedagogical approaches and instructional design of learner-centered e-learning. WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, 6(6), 365-376.

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (1999). Young children's ideas about geometric shapes. Teaching Children Mathematics, 6(8), 482-487.

Colgan, L. (2014). The role of teacher discourse in supporting mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(1), 90-111. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.1.0090

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.

CRIRES. (2005). PSLE Results Analysis. Centre for Research and Innovation in Educational and Social Transformation. University of Botswana.

Darsih, C. (2018). The effectiveness of learner-centered approach in English language teaching: A case study. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i1.10823

Davies, M. B. (2007). Doing a successful research project: Using qualitative or quantitative methods. Palgrave Macmillan.

Debois, N. (2016). Advantages and disadvantages of a questionnaire. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483381428.n13

Dempsey, J. V., Lucassen, B. A., Haynes, L. C., & Casey, M. S. (2002). Instructional gaming: Implications for instructional technology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 570-588). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Dow, U. (2017). Honourable Minister Unity Dow's Committee of Supply Speech

for Organisation 0600 - The Ministry of Basic Education. Botswana Government.

Ekwueme, C., Ekon, E., & Ezenwa-Nebife, D. (2015). The Impact of Hands-On-Approach on Student Academic Performance in Basic Science and Mathematics. Higher Education Studies, 5(6), 47. https://www. doi.org/ 10.5539/hes.v5n6p47.

Farren, C. (2008). Making mathematics relevant to students: A design-based research project. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(2), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217428

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2015). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill Education.

Gadanidis, G., & Geiger, V. (2010). Integrating technology in mathematics education: Adding a third dimension. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 10(3), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2010.514173

Gallenga, M. (2005). The impact of computer-assisted instruction on student performance in reading and mathematics. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(4), 349-365.

Gallenstein, N. L. (2005). Motivating students to participate in class discussions. Journal of Experiential Education, 28(2), 115-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590502800202

Ganyaupfu, E. M. (2013). Effects of teaching methods on the academic performance of students in public secondary schools in Nyanga District, Zimbabwe. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(5), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.17501/ijer.0501.

Gargiulo, M., & Metcalf, D. (2010). IPad implementation in a middle school special education setting. Journal of Special Education Technology, 25(3), 17-22.

Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441-467. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878102238607

Goya, M. (2016, July 04). Ministry tackles poor performance at schools. Botswana Daily

News, p. 1.

Gregory, K. J., & Chapman, O. (2007). Differentiated instructional strategies: One size doesn't fit all. Sage Publications.

Grimes, P. W., & Stevens, M. J. (2009). The role of teacher characteristics in the adoption of technology and its impact on student achievement. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(4), 519-543.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of

Physics, 66(1), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Hegedus, S. J., & Roschelle, J. (2012). The SimCalc Vision and contributions: Democratizing access to important mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 44(1), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0402-9

Hightower, A. M. (2011). Instructional leadership in mathematics: Responding to the pressures of standards-based reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(2), 139-163. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373710392876

Himmelsbach, V. M. (2015). The impact of technology on student achievement in rural schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 30(2), 1-18.

Hong, K. S., Thomas, M. K., & Kiernan, M. (2000). The effects of calculators on the mathematical problem-solving skills of middle school students with mild disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(1), 5-17.

Jafari, H., Bagheri, M., Nasri, M., & Sima, A. (2015). Factors influencing the adoption of e-learning in Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Global Journal of Health Science, 7(6), 201-209. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v7n6p201

Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Sage Publications.

Jonassen, D. H., & Roher-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299477

Kasule, G. W., & Mapolelo, D. T. (2005). Teachers' conceptions of mathematics teaching and learning in multilingual classrooms. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 4(2), 65-82.

Ke, F., & Grabowski, B. L. (2007). Gameplaying for maths learning: Cooperative or not? British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 249-259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00575.x

Kelley, K. R. (2018). A case study of effective technology use in rural schools. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(2), 93-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2018.1427113.

Kirkey, N. (2005). Implementing differentiation in the classroom. The Clearing House, 79(3), 137-140. https://doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.79.3.137-140.

Klecker, B. M. (2008). Teacher qualifications and student academic achievement. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 16(5), 1-48.

Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International.Lach, B., & Sakshaug, L. (2005). The impact of gender and computer gaming experience on high school students’ science performances. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 24(3), 229-246.

Laridon, P., Sutherland, R., & Siemon, D. (2005). Multiculturalism and mathematics education: Seeking fairness for students from non-English-speaking backgrounds. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(3), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217448

Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and principles in language teaching (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Le Roux, I. (1996). The effects of teacher discourse in science classes where a constructivist approach to teaching is implemented. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(9), 971-993. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199611)33:9<971::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-D

Littlewood, W. (2007). Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 40(3), 243-249. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004348

Lwin, Y.Y.., & Oo, W, W. (2020). The Effect of Participatory Teaching Methods on Students’ Achievement in Mathematics at the Middle School Level.J. Myanmar Academic Science, 18(9), 85-97.

Major, T., & Mangope, B. (2012). The teaching of science and mathematics in English: A South frican perspective. South African Journal of Education, 32(4), 459-468. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v32n4a618

Makewa, L. N., Otieno, W. O., & Mwamwenda, T. S. (2012). Factors contributing to students' poor performance in mathematics at Kenya certificate of secondary education in Kenya: A case of Baringo County, Kenya. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 3(5), 748-752. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/yfj3s

Mata, L., Monteiro, M., & Santos, N. (2012). ‘How do teachers relate classroom assessment with learning objectives?’ An analysis of teachers’ classroom assessment practices. Educational Research and Evaluation, 18(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2012.637862

Middleton, J. A., & Spanias, P. A. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalizations, and criticisms of the research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 65-88. https://doi.org/10.2307/749662

Mingers, J. (2003). The paucity of multimethod research: A review of the information systems literature. Information Systems Journal, 13(3), 233-249. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2575.2003.00142.x

Ministry of Education and Skills Development (MoE & SD). (2008). National policy on education. Republic of Botswana.

Monyaku, J., & Mmereki, D. (2007). Implications of science and mathematics education in Botswana: A post-independence era review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 56-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9035-3

Mogapi, M., Kagiso, B., & Gabajesane, I. (2023). Examining the learner-teacher digital divide: implications for learning in basic education classes-insights from teachers in Botswana. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 36(8), 61-80. https://doi.org/ 10.9734/jesbs/2023/v36i81248.

Mogwe, A.W., & Batlotlegi, P.A. (2020). Barriers of information communiction technology (ICT) adoption in Botswanas’ primary education. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 14(2),.217-226. https:// doi.org/ 10.11591/edulearn.v14i2.15312.

Mosekiemang, N. N. (2019). Challenges of teaching upper primary mathematics: a case study of Mogoditshane Primary Schools.

Muhangwa, G. (2023). Effects of Participatory Teaching Methods on Students’ Learning of Mathematics and Biology Subjects in Tanzania. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies 49(4):306-316. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2023/v49i41209.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2011). Calculators in the mathematics classroom. https://www.nctm.org/standards-and-positions/positions/calculators-in-the-mathematics-classroom/

NCEE (National Center for Education Evaluation). (2013). Instructional practices study in mathematics: A descriptive study of teachers' classroom practices. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20134018/

Ncube, E. D., Phiri, M. A., & Mbhele, T. P. (2022). Modern Academic Libraries Regulation: The Case Study in the Emerging Country. Journal of Governance and Regulation/Volume, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv11i3art3.

Nisbet, S., & Williams, M. (2009). Improving student outcomes in mathematics through the use of interactive online video. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(2), 80-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217434

Nkate, J. (2008, June 17). Botswana registers poor qualitative achievements in education.

Sunday Standard, p. 7.

Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Heinle & Heinle.

Ontario Ministry of Education. (2005). The Ontario curriculum: Grades 1-8. Mathematics. https://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/elementary/math18curr.pdf

Orlich, D. C., Harder, R. J., Callahan, R. C., Trevisan, M. S., & Brown, A. H. (2009). Teaching strategies: A guide to effective instruction (9th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

O’Rourke, J., Main, S. & Ellis, M.K. (2013). It doesn’t seem like work, it seems like good fun’Perceptions of primary students on the use of Handheld Game Consoles in mathematics classes. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22, 103-120. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:143461790.

Osena, G. M. (2007). Mathematics anxiety among rural and urban high school students in the Philippines. Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 87-92.

Powers, A., & Blubaugh, W. (2005). The influence of service-learning on students’ attitudes toward mathematics and mathematics teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 105(8), 382-394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18094.x

Pulos, S., & Sneider, C. (1994). The role of gaming in science and mathematics education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3(1), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01574785

Rapp, S. (2009). The effects of using manipulatives in elementary school geometry. School Science and Mathematics, 109(3), 154-159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2009.tb17995.x

Reddy, V., Juan, A., Pieternella, K., & Anil, K. (2006). South African students’ performance in the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2003. Human Sciences Research Council. http://www.hsrc.ac.za/en/research-outputs/view/2664

Rice, J. K. (2003). Teacher quality: Understanding the effectiveness of teacher attributes. Economics of Education Review, 22(1), 95-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(02)00042-8

Rittle-Johnson, B., & Jordan, N. C. (2016). Synthesis of IES research on early intervention and early childhood education (NCSER 2016-3001). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research. https://ies.ed.gov/ncser/pubs/20163001/pdf/20163001.pdf

Rudhumbu, N., & Rudhumbu, L. (2018). Implementing mathematics curriculum in primary schools in Botswana: Issues and challenges. Journal of Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(3), 63-75. http://www.jssshonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/JSSSH_Vol.4_No.3_2018_63-75_Sr-No.-3-1.pdf.

Saffari, M., Ghazisaiedi, M., Pakdaman, M., Koenig, H. G., & Pakpour, A. H. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): A study on Muslims. Journal of Religion and Health, 53(6), 1911-1921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-013-9813-8

Salani, E. (2023). Improving Classroom Mathematics Instruction: Exploring Instructional Challenges in Junior Secondary Schools in Botswana. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE), 10(12), 2023, 12-28. https://doi.org/10.20431/2349- 0381.1012002.

Salani, E., & Maphane, E. P. (2014). Botswana primary school teachers’ motivational strategies beliefs about Mathematics classroom instructional practices. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 1(11), 217-227.

Salau, A. S. (2000). Mathematics and national development. Journal of the Nigeria Mathematical Society, 19, 1-11.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2015). Research methods for business students. Pearson.

Sebesta, A. J., & Martin, B. (2004). Technology integration in the classroom: How does it impact student achievement? Journal of College Science Teaching, 33(5), 14-18.

Sharma, S. (2024). Enhancing Inclusive Learning Environments: Strategies for Curriculum Adaptation and Modification. Future of Special Education in India, 109.

Smith, D. C. (2009). Mathematics achievement and student perceptions of using manipulatives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(3), 325-344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9194-x

Spaull, N. (2011). Poverty & privilege: Primary school inequality in South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(5), 422-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.02.004

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2008). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage Publications.

Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806292430

Thomas, M. K., & Hong, K. S. (2004). Impact of calculators on the mathematics achievement of students with disabilities: A review of the literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(2), 13-23.

Thomas, R. M. (2003). Blending qualitative and quantitative research methods in theses and dissertations. Corwin Press.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. ASCD.

Venson- Moitoi, P. (2014, May 15). Mathematics, science vital to development. Botswana

Daily News. p. 2.

Walberg, H. J. (1984). Improving the productivity of America’s schools. Educational Leadership, 41(8), 19-27.

Wellington, J. (2000). Educational research: Contemporary issues and practical approaches.

Continuumn, M., Koenig, H. G., & Pakpour, A. H. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): A study on Muslims. Journal of Religion and Health, 53(6), 1911-1921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-013-9813-8

Wellington, J. (2000). Educational research: Contemporary issues and practical approaches. Continuum.

Wersch, J. V. (1997). The roots of the concept of mediation. In P. M. Greenfield & R. R. Cocking (Eds.), Cross-cultural roots of minority child development (pp. 160-174). Psychology Press.

White, M. C. (2005). The underrepresentation of minority students in gifted education: Problems and promises in recruitment and retention. The Journal of Special Education, 39(3), 130-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669050390030201.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Shimmy Sethukge and End Salani*

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0