Gold Open Access

A mathematical problem-solving framework-based Integrated STEM: Theory and practice

Ijtihadi Kamilia Amalina(1Mail), Tibor Vidákovich(2),
(1) Doctoral School of Education, University of Szeged, Hungary
(2) Institute of Education, University of Szeged, Hungary

Mail Corresponding Author

Abstract


STEM problem-solving is a core standard in education to tackle the 21st-century challenge. However, the under-represented mathematics in STEM assessment has become an issue. Moreover, the existing frameworks of STEM problem-solving are suitable for assessing activity during teaching and learning. This study covers the limitations by developing a new mathematical problem-solving-based integrated STEM framework and applying it into practice. The new framework combines and integrates frameworks in every STEM discipline. It applies in developing scenario based-test with prompting questions to show the practical use of the framework. The test was administered to 31 of 7th graders students (M=12.29, SD=.46) to prove the consistency of the new framework and the effective role of scenario and prompting questions. The results revealed four types of flows in the problem-solving process posed by students with different in evaluating, representing, and designing phases. The flow of problem-solving and the indicators in a new model were consistent but shown as a dependent process. The scenario and prompting questions worked effectively regardless of a multidimensional prompting question. Several recommendations for developing a test based on the new framework are discussed. Quantitative analysis with large sample size is required for future study.

Keywords


Framework; Mathematics; Problem-Solving; STEM;

   

Article DOI



DOI: https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v5i1.105 		       

Article Metrics

 Abstract views : 1037 
 PDF views : 367 


   

Article Pages


Pages: 1-11

   

Full Text:

PDF

References


Annaggar, A., & Rudiger, T. (2020). A video game as an assessment tool of problem-solving competence. April.

Aurah, C. M., Cassady, J. C., & McConnell, T. J. (2014). Predicting Problem Solving Ability From Metacognition and Self-Efficacy Beliefs on a Cross Validated Sample. British Journal of Education, 2(1), 49–72.

Baele, L. C. (2017). Middle School Engineering Problem Solving using Traditional vs . E-PBL Module Instruction (Issue January). Aurora University.

Bakar, M. A. A., & Ismail, N. (2020). Express students’ problem solving skills from metacognitive skills perspective on effective mathematics learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1404–1412. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080433

Bayazit, I. (2013). An investigation of problem solving approaches, strategies, and models used by the 7th and 8th grade students when solving real-world problems. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 13(3), 1920–1927. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2013.3.1419

Boero, P. (1999). Paolo Boero 1999. International Newsletter on the Teaching and Learning of Mtahematical Proof. http://www.lettredelapreuve.org/OldPreuve/Newsletter/990708Theme/990708ThemeUK.html

Docktor, J. L., Dornfeld, J., Frodermann, E., Heller, K., Hsu, L., Jackson, K. A., Mason, A., Ryan, Q. X., & Yang, J. (2016). Assessing student written problem solutions: A problem-solving rubric with application to introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010130

Erdem-Keklik, D. (2013). The Scale for Problem Solving Skills in Mathematics: Further Evidence for Construct Validity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.527

Evans, T., Thomas, M. O. J., & Klymchuk, S. (2020). Non-routine problem solving through the lens of self-efficacy. Higher Education Research and Development, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1818061

Fan, L., & Zhu, Y. (2000). Problem solving in Singaporean secondary mathematics textbooks. The Mathematics Educator, 5(1–2), 117–141.

Gray, G. L., Costanzo, F., & Plesha, M. E. (2005). Problem solving in statics and dynamics: A proposal for a structured approach. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 11543–11554. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--15371

Jolly, A. (2016). STEM by design: Strategies and activities for grades 4-8. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315679976

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Lasa, A., Abaurrea, J., & Iribas, H. (2020). Mathematical Content on STEM Activities. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.11.3.11327.333-346

Maass, K., Geiger, V., Ariza, M. R., & Goos, M. (2019). The Role of Mathematics in interdisciplinary STEM education. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 51(6), 869–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01100-5

Mehalik, M. M., Doppelt, Y., & Schuun, C. D. (2008). Middle-School Science Through Design- Based Learning versus Scripted Inquiry : Better Overall Science Concept Learning. Journal of En, January, 71–85.

Merrill, K. L., Smith, S. W., Cumming, M. M., & Daunic, A. P. (2017). A Review of Social Problem-Solving Interventions: Past Findings, Current Status, and Future Directions. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 71–102. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316652943

Naqiyah, M., Rosana, D., Sukardiyono, & Ernasari. (2020). Nationalism of High School Student. 13(4), 921–936.

OECD. (2013). PISA (2012). Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.178/9789264190511-en

OECD. (2018). PISA (2022). Mathematics Framework (DRAFT) (Issue November 2018). https://pisa2022-maths.oecd.org/

Osborne, J. (2013). The 21st century challenge for science education: Assessing scientific reasoning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.07.006

Ozturk, T., & Guven, B. (2016). Evaluating students’ beliefs in problem solving process: A case study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(3), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1208a

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003

Polya, G. (1978). How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method second edition. In The Mathematical Gazette (Vol. 30, p. 181). http://www.jstor.org/stable/3609122?origin=crossref

Priemer, B., Eilerts, K., Filler, A., Pinkwart, N., Rösken-Winter, B., Tiemann, R., & Zu Belzen, A. U. (2020). A framework to foster problem-solving in STEM and computing education. Research in Science and Technological Education, 38(1), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1600490

Robinson, N. (2016). A case study exploring the effects of using an integrative STEM curriculum on eighth grade students ’ performance and engagement in the mathematics classroom. Georgia State University.

Rudibyani, R. B., Perdana, R., & Elisanti, E. (2020). Development of problem-solving-based knowledge assessment instrument in electrochemistry. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 957–974. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13458a

Scherer, R., Meßinger-Koppelt, J., & Tiemann, R. (2014). Developing a computer-based assessment of complex problem solving in Chemistry. International Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-7822-1-2

Schraw, G., & Sperling, R. (1994). Schraw (1994) Assessing metacognitive awareness. In Contemporary Educational Psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 460–475).

Shahali, M. E. H., Halim, L., Rasul, M. S., Osman, K., & Zulkifeli, M. A. (2017). STEM learning through engineering design: Impact on middle secondary students’ interest towards STEM. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 1189–1211. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00667a

Shanta, S., & Wells, J. G. (2020). T/E design based learning: assessing student critical thinking and problem solving abilities. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09608-8

Shute, V. J., Wang, L., Greiff, S., Zhao, W., & Moore, G. (2016). Measuring problem solving skills via stealth assessment in an engaging video game. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.047

Stylianou, D. A. (2011). An examination of middle school students’ representation practices in mathematical problem solving through the lens of expert work: Towards an organizing scheme. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(3), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9273-2

Tambychik, T., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2010). Students’ difficulties in mathematics problem-solving: What do they say? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8(August), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.020

Toraman, Ç., Orakcı, Ş., & Aktan, O. (2020). Analysis of the Relationships between Mathematics Achievement, Reflective Thinking of Problem Solving and Metacognitive Awareness. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(2), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.241.6

Vargas, C. (2018). 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education Hamburg , 24-31 July 2016 CRITICAL THINKING AND PROBLEM SOLVING. July 2016.

Velasquez, Q. F., & Bueno, D. C. (2019). Metacognitive Skills in Problem Solving of Senior High School STEM Strand Students Metacognitive Skills in Problem-Solving among Senior High School STEM Strand Students. Institutional Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 2(June), 124–129. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18820.99207

Verschaffel, L., Schukajlow, S., Star, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Word problems in mathematics education: a survey. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01130-4

Wells, J. G. (2016). PIRPOSAL model of integrative STEM education: Conceptual and pedagogical framework for classroom implementation. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 75(6), 12–19. http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2013/9/16/many-us-bridges-arestructurallyunsoundsaysnewreport.html

Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941–967. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20259

Woods, D. R. (2000). An Evidence-Based Strategy. Journal of Engineering Education, October, 443–459.

Woods, Donald R. (2000). An Evidence-Based Strategy. Journal of Engineering Education, October, 443–459.

Wu, M., & Adams, R. J. (2006). Modelling mathematics problem solving item responses using a multidimensional IRT model. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(2), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217438

Yata, C., Ohtani, T., & Isobe, M. (2020). Conceptual framework of STEM based on Japanese subject principles. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00205-8


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Ijtihadi Kamilia Amalina, Tibor Vidákovich

International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research (IJTMER)

E-ISSN 2621-8488

Published by the SAINTIS Publishing
Homepage: http://ijtmer.saintispub.com/index.php/ijtmer/index
Editor E-mail : ijtmer@saintispub.com; ijtmer@gmail.com

Creative Commons License  IJTMER is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.