Gold Open Access
Students creative thinking skills on differentiated instruction
(1) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung SMP Negeri 7 Kota Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia
(2) Department of Elementary School Teacher Education, Universitas Jambi, Jambi, 36361, Indonesia
AbstractCreative thinking is one of the skills that must be possessed by students in the 21st century. This study aims to investigate and describe students' creative thinking skills in completing the Cartesian Coordinate Skills Task (CCST). This research was conducted in one of the public junior high schools in Jambi City. The research subjects were six 8th grade junior high school students who have learnt by product differentiate instruction. The research subjects were divided into 3 categories based on the results of the Knowledge Question (KQ), namely high, medium, and low. Students' creative thinking skills were tested through CCST and the results were analyzed based on creative thinking indicators. The results of this study indicate that each subject tends to be able to show aspects of fluency and flexibility, but only three subjects are able to show aspects of novelty. In addition, from the three subjects, there is 1 subject in the low category who is able to show the novelty aspects
KeywordsCreative Thinking; Differentiated Instruction; Product;
|
Article DOIDOI: https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v5i4.161 |
|
Article Metrics Abstract views : 850
PDF views : 628
|
Article PagesPages: 365-373 |
Full Text:PDF |
References
Aizikovitsh-Udi, E., & Amit, M. (2011). Developing the skills of critical and creative thinking by probability teaching. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1087–1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.243
Anggareni, P., & Hidayat, A. F. (2019). Identifikasi Tahapan Proses Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMP dalam Aktivitas Pengajuan Masalah Matematika. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 10(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v10i2.18818
Cenberci, S. (2018). The Investigation of the Creative Thinking Tendency of Prospective Mathematics Teachers in Terms of Different Variables. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(9), 78. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i9.3434
Depdiknas. (2003). Undang-undang RI No.20 tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Deunk, M. I., Smale-Jacobse, A. E., de Boer, H., Doolaard, S., & Bosker, R. J. (2018). Effective differentiation Practices:A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the cognitive effects of differentiation practices in primary education. Educational Research Review, 24, 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.02.002
Egan, A., Maguire, R., Christophers, L., & Rooney, B. (2017). Developing creativity in higher education for 21st century learners: A protocol for a scoping review. International Journal of Educational Research, 82, 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.12.004
Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2000). A Vision for School Mathematics. In Principles and standards for school mathematics: A guide for mathematicians (pp.4). United State America: NCTM.
Githua, C. M. C., & Ng’eno, B. N. (2016). Effects of Experiential Learning Approach on Students’ Mathematical Creativity among Secondary School Students of Kericho East Sub-County, Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(23), 51–57. www.iiste.org
Gomez, J. G. (2007). What Do We Know About Creativity? The Journal of Effective Teaching, 7(1), 31–43.
Hadar, L. L., & Tirosh, M. (2019). Creative thinking in mathematics curriculum: An analytic framework. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100585
Hidayat, A. F., & Anggareni, P. (2019). Proses Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dalam Pengajuan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Dikdaya (Vol. 9, Issue 2).
Jahnke, I., Haertel, T., & Wildt, J. (2015). Teachers’ conceptions of student creativity in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1088396
Kemdikbudristek. (2022a). Dimensi, Elemen, dan Subelemen Profil Pelajar Pancasila pada Kurikulum Merdeka. Kemdikbud.
Kemdikbudristek. (2022b). Kepmendikbudristek Nomor 56 tentang Pedoman Penerapan Kurikulum dalam Rangka Pemulihan Pembelajaran. Kemdikbud.
Kemdikbudristek. (2022c). Permendikbud Nomor 22 Tahun 2020 tentang Rencana Strategis Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. In Kemdikbudristek.
Kwon, O. N., Park, J. S., & Park, J. H. (2006). Cultivating Divergent Thinking in Mathematics through an Open-Ended Approach. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7(1), 51–61. https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03036784
Lucas, B., Claxton, G., & Spencer, E. (2012). Progression in Student Creativity in School: First Steps Towards New Forms of Formative Assessments. Progression in Student Creativity in School: First Steps To-Wards New Forms of Formative Assessments, 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k4dp59msdwk-en
Mann, E. L. (2006). Creativity: The Essence of Mathematics. Journal of the Education of Gifted, 30(2), 236–260. http://www.prufrock.com
Nasution. (2007). Perencanaan Pembelajaran: Pengertian, Tujuan Dan Prosedur. ITTIHAD, 1(2), 185–195. http://ejournal-ittihad.alittihadiyahsumut.or.id/index.php/ittihad/article/view/23/18
Nissim, Y., Weissblueth, E., Scott-Webber, L., & Amar, S. (2016). The Effect of a Stimulating Learning Environment on Pre-Service Teachers’ Motivation and 21st Century Skills. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(3), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n3p29
OECD. (2019). Programme for international student assessment (PISA) results from PISA 2018. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018_CN_IDN.pdf
Ohio Department of Education. (2015). Partnership for 21 st Century Skills-CORE CONTENT INTEGRATION. www.P21.org.
Palieraki, S., & Koutrouba, K. (2021). Differentiated instruction in information and communications technology teaching and effective learning in primary education. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1487–1504. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.3.1487
Prast, E. J., van de Weijer-Bergsma, E., Kroesbergen, E. H., & van Luit, J. E. H. (2018). Differentiated instruction in primary mathematics: Effects of teacher professional development on student achievement. Learning and Instruction, 54, 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.009
Sarrazy, B., & Novotná, J. (2013). Didactical contract and responsiveness to didactical contract: a theoretical framework for enquiry into students’ creativity in mathematics. ZDM, 45(2), 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0496-4
Satria, R., Adiprima, P., Wulan, K. S., & Harjatanaya, T. Y. (2022). Memahami Projek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila. Projek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila (pp.1). Jakarta: Kemdikbudristek.
Shareefa, M., & Moosa, V. (2020). The Most-cited Educational Research Publications on Differentiated Instruction: A Bibliometric Analysis. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.331
Sheffield, L. J. (2013). Creativity and school mathematics: Some modest observations. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(2), 325–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0484-8
Silver, E. A. (1994). Fostering Creativity through Instruction Rich in Mathematical Problem Solving and Problem Posing.
Smale-Jacobse, A. E., Meijer, A., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Maulana, R. (2019). Differentiated Instruction in Secondary Education: A Systematic Review of Research Evidence. Frontiers in Psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 1–23). Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02366
Smutny, J. F. (2011). Differentiated Instruction for Young Gifted Children: How Parents Can Help. Parenting Gifted Children (pp. 221–233).
Sriraman, B., & Lee, K. H. (2013). Creativity and mathematical problem posing: An analysis of high school students’ mathematical problem posing in China and the USA. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(2), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9419-5
Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2022). Assessment of mathematical creative thinking: A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101019
Švecová, V., Rumanová, L., & Pavlovičová, G. (2014). Support of Pupil’s Creative Thinking in Mathematical Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1715–1719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.461
Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria: ASCD.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. Alexandria: ASCD.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners 2nd Edition. Alexandria: ASCD. www.ascd.org/deskcopy.
Torrance. (1963). What Is Meant by Creative: Way of Learning. In Creativity What Research Says to The Teacher, (pp. 14). Washington DC: National Education Asociation.
Ulfah, U., Prabawanto, S., & Jupri, A. (2017). Students’ Mathematical Creative Thinking through Problem Posing Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012097
Valiandes, S., & Bermúdez Martínez, M. (2017). Teachers’ Guide to Differentiated Instruction. DiDeSu Erasmus Plus Partners - Cyprus Pedagogical Institute, University of Granada. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318420929
Volle, E. (2018). Associative and controlled cognition in divergent thinking: Theoretical, experimental, neuroimaging evidence, and new directions. The Cambridge Handbook of the Neuroscience of Creativity (pp. 333–360). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316556238.020
Watts-Taffe, S., Laster, B. P., Broach, L., Marinak, B., Connor, C. M. D., & Walker-Dalhouse, D. (2012). Differentiated instruction: Making informed teacher decisions. Reading Teacher, 66(4), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01126
Yuli, T., & Siswono, E. (2004). Identifying Creative Thinking Process of Students Through Mathematics Problem Posing. International Conference on Statistics and Mathematics and Its Application in the Development of Science and Technology, 85–89. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282946292
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Peni Anggareni, Akhmad Faisal Hidayat




Abstract views : 850
