Gold Open Access
Program Evaluation of Independent Campus Learning Program (MBKM) in IAIN Ternate Kirkpatrick Model
(1) IAIN Ternate, Ternate, Indonesia
(2) IAIN Ternate, Ternate, Indonesia
(3) IAIN Ternate, Ternate, Indonesia
(4) IAIN Ternate, Ternate, Indonesia
AbstractEducation has an important role in people's lives and in the future, with the hope that improving the quality of education can reduce crime rates. The Independent Campus Learning Program (MBKM) is a government initiative to increase student productivity and reduce truancy in tertiary institutions. MBKM aims to improve the quality of human resources, graduates, and educational institutions. This research focuses on the IAIN Ternate campus, especially the Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teaching Science (FTIK) which has 8 study programs. The research method used is qualitative and quantitative (Mix Method). Researchers used the draft MBKM guidelines from the FGD results to create variable indicators and create research instruments. The instrument was validated by three education experts using a Likert scale. The results showed that the implementation of the first level of MBKM (Reaction) had not been fully socialized to the study program coordinators. The guidelines used are still in draft form and have not been approved by the chancellor, indicating that the campus has not been wholeheartedly involved in implementing MBKM. The MBKM guideline draft is also still imperfect and is in the data collection stage regarding the number of credits of courses that will be involved in the MBKM.
KeywordsKirkpatrick model, MBKM , Evaluation
|
Article DOIDOI: https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v6i2.234 |
|
Article Metrics Abstract views : 551
PDF views : 269
|
Article PagesPages: 170-176 |
Full Text:PDF |
References
Akhtar, H. (2017, September 01). Berapa Jumlah Rater dan Nilai Minimal yang Dapat Diterima pada Uji Validitas Isi? Retrieved from Semesta Psikometrika: https://www.semestapsikometrika.com/2017/09/berapa-jumlah-rater-dan-nilai-minimal.html
Alfikalia, Haryanto, H. C., & Widyaningsih, A. (2022). Dinamika Pengelolaan Program Merdeka Belajar - Kampus Merdeka Pada Kampus Swasta. Jurnal Studi Guru dan Pembelajaran, 5(1), 111-123.
Antoni, A., Ritonga, N., Ahmad, H., & Hadi, A. J. (2022). Implementasi Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) pada Mahasiswa Universitas Aufa Royhan Padangsidimpuan. Jurnal Education and Development, 10(1), 391-394.
Bicara HR. (2021, January 19). Evaluasi Model Kirkpatrick. Retrieved from Bicara HR: https://www.bicarahr.id/2021/01/evaluasi-model-kirkpatrick.html
Krishnapatria, K. (2021). Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) Curriculum in English Studies Program: Challenges and Opportunities. ELT in Focus, 4(1).
Nurkholiq, A. (2022). Adaptasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) Berbasis Kkni (Model MBKM Program Studi di Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam). Aswaja: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Keislaman, 2(1), 24-37.
Rida Fironika Kusumadewi, S. Y. (2020). Menumbuhkan Kemandirian Siswa Selama Pembelajaran Daring Sebagai Dampak Covid-19 di SD. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dasar, 1(1).
Suharsimi, A. (2009). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman Teoretis Praktis bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Suharsimi, A. (2012). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Supriyati, Y., & Muqorobin, M. (2021). Mixed Model CIPP dan Kickpatrick Sebagai Pendekatan Evaluasi Program Pengembangan Kompetensi Guru Berbasis Kebutuhan Peningkatan Kemampuan Asessment Literasi-Numerasi (CILAPP Model dalam Evaluasi Program). Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 7(1).
Tomoliyus, & Sunardianta, R. (2020). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Tes Reaktif Agility Tenis Meja. Jurnal Keolahragaan, 8(2).
Yustiana, S., & Kusumadewi, R. F. (2020). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Modul Berbasis CTL Sebagai Bagian Dari Pengembangan SSP. Jurnal Ilmiah Kontekstual, 1(2).
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Adiyana Adam, Kamarun M. Sebe, Kartini Limatahu, Yuliyani Jaohar




Abstract views : 551
